03. Children and Young People

The Children’s Rights Alliance for England v Secretary of State for Justice [2012] EWHC 8 (Admin) (11 January 2012)

The use of restraints against young people in Secure Training Centres The Children’s Rights Alliance for England v Secretary of State for Justice [2012] EWHC 8 (Admin) (11 January 2012) Summary This decision of the England and Wales High Court held that whilst certain measures had been unlawfully perpetrated against young people in secure training [...]

Aldridge v R [2011] ACTCA 20 (22 September 2011)

Care and protection of children a relevant consideration in granting bail or sentencing a parent Aldridge v R [2011] ACTCA 20 (22 September 2011) Summary The ACT Court of Appeal has held that, by operation of s 11(2) of the Human Rights Act 2004 (ACT), the arrangements for care of children is a relevant factor [...]

L.N.P. v Argentine Republic, Comm. No. 1610/2007, UN Doc. CCPR/C/102/D/1610/2007 (16 August 2011)

Treatment of young rape survivor violated ICCPR L.N.P. v Argentine Republic, Comm. No. 1610/2007, UN Doc. CCPR/C/102/D/1610/2007 (2011) The Human Rights Committee recently found that Argentina’s treatment of a 15 year-old rape survivor violated articles 2(3), 3, 7, 14(1), 17, 24 and 26 of the International Covenant of Civil and Political Rights. Facts L.N.P., an [...]

S v S (CCT 63/10) [2011] ZACC 7 (29 March 2011)

Consideration of the Rights of the Child in Sentencing of a Parent S v S (CCT 63/10) [2011] ZACC 7 (29 March 2011) Summary This case considered the degree to which a court is required to take into consideration the best interests of the child when determining the appropriate sentence to impose upon a primary [...]

Johns & Anor, R (on the application of) v Derby City Council & Anor [2011] EWHC 375 (Admin) (28 February 2011)

Religious Expression May be Limited to Protect the Rights of Child Johns & Anor, R (on the application of) v Derby City Council & Anor [2011] EWHC 375 (Admin) (28 February 2011) Summary The England and Wales High Court recently found that the right to religious expression could be limited where attitudes towards sexuality might [...]

Secretary to the Department of Human Services v Sanding [2011] VSC 42 (22 February 2011)

Aboriginal Children Returned to Care of Maternal Grandmother as Court Finds Charter Applies to Child Welfare Proceedings Secretary to the Department of Human Services v Sanding [2011] VSC 42 (22 February 2011) Summary The Supreme Court of Victoria has ruled that the Children’s Court of Victoria (‘Court’) had the discretion to make orders returning four [...]

ZH (Tanzania) FC (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 4 (1 February 2011)

Best Interests of Child Paramount in Decisions to Deport Parents ZH (Tanzania) FC (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 4 (1 February 2011) Summary The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom has held that the ‘best interests of the child’ should be the first consideration where children are affected by [...]

Ali v United Kingdom – 40385/06 [2011] ECHR 17 (11 January 2011)

School Exclusion and the Right to Education Ali v United Kingdom – 40385/06 [2011] ECHR 17 (11 January 2011) The European Court of Human Rights has held that the exclusion of a student from school during the investigation of a criminal offence, and subsequent removal of the student from the school’s roll, did not constitute [...]

Suppiah & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 2 (Admin) (11 January 2011)

Detention of Children in Immigration Facilities a Breach of Human Rights Suppiah & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 2 (Admin) (11 January 2011) The High Court of England and Wales decided that two families who had sought asylum in the United Kingdom were detained [...]

MXL, R (on the application of) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 2397 (Admin) (30 September 2010)

The Welfare of Children must be ‘Primary Consideration’ in Decisions Regarding Immigration Detention of Parents MXL, R (on the application of) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 2397 (Admin) (30 September 2010) The England and Wales High Court has held that the immigration detention of a Jamaican woman with [...]

AB and Victorian Equal Opportunity & Human Rights Commission and Department of Human Services and Separate Representative of J [2010] VCC AD-10-003 (6 August 2010)

Adoption by Gay Men and Lesbian Women: Two Steps Forward, One Step Back… In the matter of an Application pursuant to s 11(3) Adoption Act (Vic) 1984 AB and Victorian Equal Opportunity & Human Rights Commission and Department of Human Services and Separate Representative of J [2010] VCC AD-10-003 (6 August 2010) A recent decision [...]

Laxmi Mandal v Deen Dayal Harinagar Hospital & Ors [2010] 8853/2008 and Jaitun v Janpura Maternity Home & Ors [2010] 10700/2009 (High Court of Delhi, 4 June 2010)

Right to Life Includes Right to Health and Freedom from Poverty Laxmi Mandal v Deen Dayal Harinagar Hospital & Ors [2010] 8853/2008 and Jaitun v Janpura Maternity Home & Ors [2010] 10700/2009 (High Court of Delhi, 4 June 2010) The High Court of Delhi has issued directions in response to the systemic failures resulting in [...]

R v Ashman [2010] ACTSC 45 (21 May 2010)

Right to Family and Protection of Children Relevant to Sentencing of Parent R v Ashman [2010] ACTSC 45 (21 May 2010) In this case, the ACT Supreme Court recognised that the right to family and the best interests of children under the Human Rights Act 2004 (ACT) may be relevant to the sentencing of a [...]

Michelle Dawson v Transport Accident Commission [2010] VCAT 796 (13 May 2010)

VCAT Considers Relevance of Charter to Availability of Payments for Childcare from Transport Accident Commission Michelle Dawson v Transport Accident Commission [2010] VCAT 796 (13 May 2010) Facts Ms Dawson was seriously injured in a car accident on 13 October 2005.  As a result of her injuries Ms Dawson received a number of therapies in [...]

Castles v Secretary of the Department of Justice & Ors [2010] VSC 181 (4 May 2010)

Supreme Court Orders Speedy Trial to Determine Prisoner’s Eligibility to Access IVF Treatment under Victorian Charter Castles v Secretary of the Department of Justice & Ors [2010] VSC 181 (4 May 2010) The Supreme Court of Victoria has rejected an application by a female prisoner for an injunction restraining the Secretary of the Department of [...]

Birmingham City Council v Clue [2010] EWCA Civ 460 (29 April 2010)

Obligation of Public Authorities to Provide Accommodation and Support to Destitute Family Birmingham City Council v Clue [2010] EWCA Civ 460 (29 April 2010) In this case, the England and Wales Court of Appeal held that the Birmingham City Council’s refusal to provide financial assistance and accommodation to a family while their immigration application was [...]

MAK and RK v United Kingdom [2010] ECHR 363 (23 March 2010)

Right to Privacy and Protection of Children and Families MAK and RK v United Kingdom [2010] ECHR 363 (23 March 2010) The European Court of Human Rights has held that restrictive hospital visiting conditions imposed on a father, the first applicant, suspected of abusing his daughter, the second applicant, breached the right to private and [...]

AD and OD v United Kingdom [2010] ECHR 340 (16 March 2010)

Right to Private Life and Protection of Children AD and OD v United Kingdom [2010] ECHR 340 (16 March 2010) The European Court of Human Rights has held that the United Kingdom breached its obligation to respect private and family life under art 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights because of errors made [...]

Inquest into the Death of Tyler Cassidy: Ruling on applications to be granted leave to participate as Interested Parties pursuant to s 56 Coroners Act 2008 (4 March 2010)

Coroner Considers Applications for Leave to Make Submissions on Charter of Rights in Police Shooting Inquest  Inquest into the Death of Tyler Cassidy: Ruling on applications to be granted leave to participate as Interested Parties pursuant to s 56 Coroners Act 2008 (4 March 2010) The Coroner’s Court of Victoria recently considered applications by three [...]

Zaunegger v Germany [2009] ECHR 22028/04 (3 December 2009)

Right to Respect for Family Life and Equal Treatment: Fathers’ Right to Custody of a Child Born out of Wedlock Zaunegger v Germany [2009] ECHR 22028/04 (3 December 2009) In this case, the European Court of Human Rights held by six votes to one that the denial of a fathers’ right to custody of a [...]

A, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Croydon [2009] UKSC 8 (26 November 2009)

What is a ‘Child’?  Age Determination in Asylum Applications A, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Croydon [2009] UKSC 8 (26 November 2009) The difficulty in determining age has become prominent as a consequence of the increased movement of children around the world, and specifically the increased migration of unaccompanied young people.  [...]

Omojudi v United Kingdom [2009] ECHR 1820/08 (24 November 2009)

Deportation of Non-Nationals and the Right to Respect for Family Life Omojudi v United Kingdom [2009] ECHR 1820/08 (24 November 2009) The European Court of Human Rights has held that the deportation of Steven Omojudi from the United Kingdom to Nigeria was an unjustifiable interference with Omojudi’s right to respect for private and family life [...]

R (on the application of L) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2009] UKSC 3 (29 October 2009)

Criminal Records and the Right to Privacy R (on the application of L) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2009] UKSC 3 (29 October 2009) The United Kingdom Supreme Court has held that decisions to release information stored in public records about an individual’s criminal convictions, including non-conviction information, will always engage art 8 [...]

Carey Baptist Grammar School Ltd (Anti-Discrimination Exemption) [2009] VCAT 2221 (23 October 2009)

Equality and Exemptions: Discrimination to Promote Gender Equality in Education Carey Baptist Grammar School Ltd (Anti-Discrimination Exemption) [2009] VCAT 2221 (23 October 2009) Carey Baptist Grammar School (‘Carey’) was also successful in its application to VCAT for an exemption from the Equal Opportunity Act 1995 (Vic) (‘EO Act’).  VCAT renewed Carey’s exemption to enable it [...]

Centre for Child Law v Minister for Justice and Constitutional Development and Others (with the National Institute for Crime Prevention and the Re-integration of Offenders as Amicus Curiae) [2009] ZACC 18 (15 July 2009)

Rights of the Child and Minimum Sentencing Legislation Centre for Child Law v Minister for Justice and Constitutional Development and Others (with the National Institute for Crime Prevention and the Re-integration of Offenders as Amicus Curiae) [2009] ZACC 18 (15 July 2009) The Constitutional Court of South Africa upheld a decision of the High Court [...]

AC v Manitoba (Director of Child and Family Services), 2009 SCC 30 (26 June 2009)

Supreme Court of Canada Balances the Right to Freedom of Religion and the Best Interests of Children AC v Manitoba (Director of Child and Family Services), 2009 SCC 30 (26 June 2009) On 26 June 2009, the Canadian Supreme Court handed down a decision which discussed in detail the right of adolescents to make their [...]

Kulikowski v Poland [2009] ECHR 18353/03 (19 May 2009)

Right of Access to Court Imposes Positive Obligation on Courts to Inform Litigants of Rights and Entitlements Kulikowski v Poland [2009] ECHR 18353/03 (19 May 2009) The European Court of Human Rights has held that the right to access courts imposes positive obligations on courts to inform individuals of their entitlements, that delays in obtaining [...]

Khadr v Canada (Minister for Justice) [2009] FC 405 (23 April 2009)

Obligations of States to Citizens Detained Abroad Khadr v Canada (Minister for Justice) [2009] FC 405 On 23 April 2009, the Federal Court of Canada handed down a decision which discussed in detail the right of citizens to request their government to provide protection against acts which violate accepted norms of international law during a [...]

E (a child), Re (Northern Ireland) [2008] UKHL 66 (12 November 2008)

In this case, the House of Lords decided that a police response to sectarian unrest in Northern Ireland did not constitute a breach by the State of its positive obligation to prevent the infliction of inhuman and degrading treatment upon its citizens under art 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Baroness Hale discussed [...]

EM (Lebanon) v Secretary of State for The Home Department [2008] UKHL 64 (22 October 2008)

The House of Lords recently ruled that a foreign national could not be removed from the UK in circumstances that would completely deny or nullify her right to family life, since such removal would be incompatible with the UK’s obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights, given domestic effect by the Human Rights Act [...]

AS (Pakistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 1118 (15 October 2008)

The England and Wales Court of Appeal recently allowed an appeal against a decision of the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal regarding the deportation of AS, a Pakistani national. The Court held that the Tribunal erred in two respects: first, in finding that deportation would not interfere with AS’ right to respect for his private and [...]

RK and AK v United Kingdom [2008] ECHR 38000(1)/05 (30 September 2008)

The European Court of Human Rights has held that a UK decision of a public authority to remove a child from its family, on the basis of an incorrect diagnosis, was not a breach of art 8 of the European Convention of Human Rights which provides for the right to respect for private and family [...]

R(C) v Secretary of State for Justice [2008] EWCA Civ 882 (28 July 2008)

In this case, the England and Wales Court of Appeal held that rules introduced to maintain good order and discipline in children detained in Secure Training Centres (‘STCs’) should be quashed for breach of art 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which prohibits torture and other ill-treatment. Detailed case note.

X v Croatia [2008] ECHR 11223/04 (17 July 2008)

The European Court of Human Rights has held that, by allowing an individual to be excluded from participating in their child’s adoption proceedings, Croatia violated its obligation to ensure the right to respect for private and family life under art 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Detailed case note.

VM v British Columbia (Director of Child, Family and Community Service) 2008 BCSC 449 (13 June 2008)

The Supreme Court of British Columbia has held that the decisions of a Provincial Court and a public official to authorise medically-necessary blood transfusions for four infants against the express wishes of their parents did not breach the parents’ rights under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Detailed case note.

Maslov v Austria [2008] ECHR [GC] 1638/03 (23 June 2008)

The Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights has held that the deportation of a youth who had spent the majority of his childhood in Austria constituted a violation of his right to respect for his family and private life.

R v DB [2008] SCC 25 (16 May 2008)

The Supreme Court of Canada recently considered the validity of a rebuttable presumption that minors committing serious offences should be sentenced as adults.  A majority of the Court concluded that the presumption offended against the right not to be deprived of liberty otherwise than in accordance with principles of fundamental justice under s 7 of [...]

Murray v Big Pictures (UK) Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 446 (07 May 2008)

The England and Wales Court of Appeal has considered that scope of a child’s right to privacy in a case in which photographs of the child of a celebrity were taken and published without consent. Detailed case note.

DPP v TY (No 3) [2007] VSC 489 (28 November 2007)

In sentencing a young offender found guilty of murder, Bell J of the Supreme Court of Victoria had regard to international human rights principles, including the rights of the child under the Convention on the Rights of the Child, in the exercise of his sentencing discretion. Detailed case note. Full text decision: www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/vic/VSC/2007/489.html